>>105639791
>>105639827
looking at this i can see why you would decide against backblaze, their fucking landing page is a mess and looks programmed and written by a jeet with a good handle on english. theres basically no information at all about how it works and what the usage limits are (there have to be usage limits, otherwise whats to stop me from just putting the entire internet in my personal back up at their expense?) trying to figure out their terms without having to break open their TOS is enough to already irritate me and i dont imagine its going to get any better if and when i do.