Search Results
8/9/2025, 12:29:09 AM
>>512567690
>You accused me of being part of some massive media conspiracy
I accused you of being a part of a playbook.
This is not only consistent with my posts, but elaborated:
>>leftists to rely on top-down narratives that even the higher-ups know are bullshit
>>"At best," you're feeding into a corporation selling you outrage for profit. At worst, you're actively peddling a politically-motivated lie
>>you used [this method] for the Steele Dossier. And Kavanaugh. And the "Russia hacked the election" narrative...
You like banana analogies? pThis would be like if some company that sells exclusively grapes wants banana sales to plummet, so they have their friends in disgraced rags like Fruit News Network publish a hoax that bananas had Russian hookers piss on them, or that a banana-loving SC nominee raped someone, or that Americans liking bananas is a fabrication from Russia. They can dothis because they know people that buy grapes are sl gullible and dogmatic that they'll repeat it en masse. Now the same grape-sellers, FNN, and the like are saying that bananas are part of a pedophile ring, and you're here repeating it.
See the point yet, or do I need to be even more-on-the-nose?
>You accused me of claiming that conspiracies don't exist
No, I called you out for stating there wasn't an anti-Trump "conspiracy" and then IMMEDIATELY afterwards yielding that it happens (receipt: >>512562601)
This is the second time you have blatantly lied to my face.
>Simply that I understand why you did it
>Simply
It's as-if you're trying to be an insufferable faggot.
"Attacking you" and "informing people" are not mutually exclusive, because you are both dishonest and evil.
It's funny too that you think someone can only do one or the other, as if admitting that you really aren't here to have any kind of good-faith talk - just to yap and mald.
>How long will you need for it cause you to shill for a pedophile
Says the redditor.
You lost, nigger. Both this argument and the election.
>You accused me of being part of some massive media conspiracy
I accused you of being a part of a playbook.
This is not only consistent with my posts, but elaborated:
>>leftists to rely on top-down narratives that even the higher-ups know are bullshit
>>"At best," you're feeding into a corporation selling you outrage for profit. At worst, you're actively peddling a politically-motivated lie
>>you used [this method] for the Steele Dossier. And Kavanaugh. And the "Russia hacked the election" narrative...
You like banana analogies? pThis would be like if some company that sells exclusively grapes wants banana sales to plummet, so they have their friends in disgraced rags like Fruit News Network publish a hoax that bananas had Russian hookers piss on them, or that a banana-loving SC nominee raped someone, or that Americans liking bananas is a fabrication from Russia. They can dothis because they know people that buy grapes are sl gullible and dogmatic that they'll repeat it en masse. Now the same grape-sellers, FNN, and the like are saying that bananas are part of a pedophile ring, and you're here repeating it.
See the point yet, or do I need to be even more-on-the-nose?
>You accused me of claiming that conspiracies don't exist
No, I called you out for stating there wasn't an anti-Trump "conspiracy" and then IMMEDIATELY afterwards yielding that it happens (receipt: >>512562601)
This is the second time you have blatantly lied to my face.
>Simply that I understand why you did it
>Simply
It's as-if you're trying to be an insufferable faggot.
"Attacking you" and "informing people" are not mutually exclusive, because you are both dishonest and evil.
It's funny too that you think someone can only do one or the other, as if admitting that you really aren't here to have any kind of good-faith talk - just to yap and mald.
>How long will you need for it cause you to shill for a pedophile
Says the redditor.
You lost, nigger. Both this argument and the election.
8/8/2025, 10:59:01 PM
Page 1