Search Results
8/1/2025, 5:02:18 PM
>>29229430
I've personally found that Wan has better results around 120ish frames compared to 81. But the generation time, especially with wan2.2, becomes absurd when you go that high.
This was 121 frames and took a little under an hour and a half to gen at 720p using a 4090.
I've personally found that Wan has better results around 120ish frames compared to 81. But the generation time, especially with wan2.2, becomes absurd when you go that high.
This was 121 frames and took a little under an hour and a half to gen at 720p using a 4090.
8/1/2025, 5:02:18 PM
>>29229430
I've personally found that Wan has better results around 120ish frames compared to 81. But the generation time, especially with wan2.2, becomes absurd when you go that high.
This was 121 frames and took a little under an hour and a half to gen at 720p using a 4090.
I've personally found that Wan has better results around 120ish frames compared to 81. But the generation time, especially with wan2.2, becomes absurd when you go that high.
This was 121 frames and took a little under an hour and a half to gen at 720p using a 4090.
8/1/2025, 5:02:18 PM
>>29229430
I've personally found that Wan has better results around 120ish frames compared to 81. But the generation time, especially with wan2.2, becomes absurd when you go that high.
This was 121 frames and took a little under an hour and a half to gen at 720p using a 4090.
I've personally found that Wan has better results around 120ish frames compared to 81. But the generation time, especially with wan2.2, becomes absurd when you go that high.
This was 121 frames and took a little under an hour and a half to gen at 720p using a 4090.
Page 1