>>512758232
>nah thanks for preemtively discrediting a foid, a nog, a mystery meat, and fat charlie kirk

>>512619927
Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, the responsibility to protect civilians in war is on the party with control over their access to food, water, and medicine
“Consent” isn’t relevant here — you can’t starve 2 million people because their leadership won’t surrender. That’s why collective punishment is prohibited in the first place.

And no, lack of conviction is not proof of innocence — it’s proof that the perpetrator hasn’t faced trial. History is full of atrocities that went unpunished at the time.