morally convenable solutions do not annihilates negative valence, this is a conventionally unlikely and disingenuous false ideal. resolution must reduce undesirable experiences to the extent determined by a set of constraints in their respective sociopolitical or physiopsychological contexts. the objection that the arguments of mine are retrograde is a misfounded self-emancipation and distortion solely highlighting the incompleteness of understandings and projection of misconceptions from the original perpetrators, rather tha revealing some hypothetical incongruous weakness in the former. thus the initial erratically-provisioned counter-arguments have always been illegitimate and unsound, as the inevitable accumulation of conceptual and meta-reflective evidences converge to that point. evidently self-serving narcissists will dismiss anything they fail to understand as invalid, but the problem lies in the mismatched inadequate intellectual capabilities, not the integrity of conceptual constructions in themselves. nocuous strategy formed by subconscious-initiated perpetual externalization of burden of proof comes at the cost of a strong lack of introspective potential where the less intelligent individual can not afford to doubt themselves due to high relative cost of apprehending epistemological negative space in neural structures of limited growth.

consequently, the cumulative offenses of the perpetrators which include incitement to suicide, projection and deflection of anti-ethical practices, shameless destruction of artistic values, and financial enticement on fundamentally flawed pyramidal structures, will be referred to by «cartoon narcissism» where the grotesque and exaggerated conducts of the socio-primitive animal is humorously ridicule in itself.

xoxo