>>533650547
because they generated with collectivist which is generally at odds with taking things that make you OK with sitting around doing nothing
>buh buh but what about loosifereyum???
impossible to use on a wide scale, individual benefits are negligible
>buh buh but why do nobles care??
some nobles either actually believe in their own belief system or they will simply get insta-reported by the jannyssaries assigned to babysit them when they get seen snorting a fat line of coke at a colonial party

I do think there should be more allowance for even "bad" traits or pawns occasionally benefiting the player, in this case a dickhead noble (or whatever they're called from having shit traits and making decrees) should also not care about taking drugs that make them happier. It should also be gated by mood, a woman who lost her ENTIRE family in one day wouldn't give a fuck about her christianity standing in the way of momentarily coping by abusing opiates