>>512022547
Even if it were AI-slop (which I doubt); it's doubly pathetic that you're unable to produce a cogent refutation or counter thesis, instead relying on saying nuh uh and worrying whether your worthless dumb comments are getting owned by the surface level "analysis" (more a collation of things out there) that AI would provide.
Are you kind of dumb?
Perhaps the question is superfluous given you support the kremlin and don't even have any sophistry to throw back at what would by your judgement be a surface level analysis.
Get bent you dumb whoreson.