>>509538042
that doesn't mean that their actions were sanctioned by any official governing masonic body. in fact, no masonic organization approved of this "lodge." It was a fake lodge. It would have been like you and a few friends buying Freemason regalia off Amazon and calling yourself a lodge in your basement, even though no one in Freemasonry even knew who you were

>>508820021
whe conspiracy theorists read these books, they misundestand them and arrive at the wrong conclusions. that's what happens when you start from a point of ignorance.
>>508820308
neither
>>508820336
meh, at least you're not accusing them of far-out schizo stuff like you usually do.
>>508820247
you have no idea what that actually means though.