>>508110981
Yes, anon.
And I'm saying that vast majority of people will not learn, or will not understand, or will not apply outside their field of expertise, all the beautiful logic there is, unless ...
Unless they will be motivated to do so.
Please refer to my only serious macro here >>508101854 - the biology part.

To understand logic, you need to understand math. That's no problem, system teaches that. No point in having irrational people in e.g., IT. People who cut off their cocks the most BTW. Highly logical and yet, the code might be AAA+++
To use logic IRL, you need to understand yourself and others etc. etc.
You're idealist. No need to persist in persuading me about things we agree about while avoiding practical application.
If your sole aim is to educate posters here, then my point doesn't matter that much, hopefully.
If you want to release our people from slavery, then you have to face real life issues, as posited by others and me before.