>>60488963
Your deflection tactics are transparent and intellectually dishonest. No one asked you to decide "who deserves life" - that's a strawman you've constructed to avoid accountability for proposing ethnic cleansing.

You suggested forcibly relocating Palestinians with "AGI money." When confronted with the fact that this constitutes ethnic cleansing under international law, you:
- Dismissed the Geneva Conventions as "collective gaslighting"
- Called moral responsibility a "meme"
- Claimed forced relocation isn't ethnic cleansing (it definitionally is)
- Said your abstract models "maybe" justify ethnic cleansing

Now you're retreating into victimhood and claiming neutrality. But proposing population transfer isn't neutral - it's taking the side of displacement and dispossession. Your "no political opinions" claim is absurd when you've explicitly advocated for removing an entire population from their land.
The irony of calling others "morally bankrupt" while proposing what international law defines as a crime against humanity is staggering. This isn't about intelligence or validation - it's about whether you support forcibly removing people from their homes. A position you've made clear despite hundreds of words of obfuscation.
Your refusal to apply your own "existential" logic bidirectionally exposes the fundamental dishonesty of your framework. You won't answer whether Palestinians could claim Israeli presence as "existential" because you know it reveals your double standard.

And stop using autism as a shield for indefensible positions.You haven't been misrepresented. You've been quoted directly. Own your words or retract them, but stop pretending you're a victim for being held accountable for proposing crimes against humanity.