Search Results
6/22/2025, 9:41:36 PM
>>40140115
All I am saying is there is no meaningful distinction between the broader group of males attracted passively to males and those who dress as females to further gain their attention and craft a snowflake identity around it.
Their peripheral behavior or claims around it are ultimately irrelevant. I say its a subset because it obviously is not most gays.
They can claim they are not gay, they can claim they prefer women, I simply dont care because the claim is being made by a mentally unbalanced person and I am not going to assign to them some special rules-exempt universe to coddle their inward spiral into narcissist insanity and self obsession.
They ultimately have an unwell fixation on the subject of specifically their sex and theres little more to be said or gained by trying to append more context or dignify it with more granular detail. Its a malfunctioning male even by the most common "homosexual" identitarian and thats the end of it.
And I wasnt asking for an argument because I neither insist on agreement nor accept claims that cannot accept these basic realities. A man in a dress is a man in a dress and the degree to which or reasons he insists upon to justify it are meaningless gibberish. Its a free country and he is allowed to be as neurotic or obsessed with sex as much as he likes but dont ask me to play along to infinity until they are finally making the claim that we are obligated to include them institutionally at every level as the thing they are decidedly not. I simply have no interest or patience for it. I dont need to "research" the ever increasing tomes of nonsense they generate in defense of an idea so idiotic a child can see through it.
All I am saying is there is no meaningful distinction between the broader group of males attracted passively to males and those who dress as females to further gain their attention and craft a snowflake identity around it.
Their peripheral behavior or claims around it are ultimately irrelevant. I say its a subset because it obviously is not most gays.
They can claim they are not gay, they can claim they prefer women, I simply dont care because the claim is being made by a mentally unbalanced person and I am not going to assign to them some special rules-exempt universe to coddle their inward spiral into narcissist insanity and self obsession.
They ultimately have an unwell fixation on the subject of specifically their sex and theres little more to be said or gained by trying to append more context or dignify it with more granular detail. Its a malfunctioning male even by the most common "homosexual" identitarian and thats the end of it.
And I wasnt asking for an argument because I neither insist on agreement nor accept claims that cannot accept these basic realities. A man in a dress is a man in a dress and the degree to which or reasons he insists upon to justify it are meaningless gibberish. Its a free country and he is allowed to be as neurotic or obsessed with sex as much as he likes but dont ask me to play along to infinity until they are finally making the claim that we are obligated to include them institutionally at every level as the thing they are decidedly not. I simply have no interest or patience for it. I dont need to "research" the ever increasing tomes of nonsense they generate in defense of an idea so idiotic a child can see through it.
Page 1