>>105831507
yeah but then it doesnt work as intended bc it forces an artificial complexity

no, srsly
look at this fucking dogshit
im 1 gorilion percent sure theres a false security factor going on somewhere
>>105831518
>Have you tried just writing correct code?
i have 500k of C under my belt
yes it took 200K before i started being error-less
but now im there i dont need red tape

what i posit is that we should take programming as seriously as medicine
5 year study then specialization

>>105831529
they never stood a chance to be honest
and thats 100% on how you cant be political in your code