>>532492469
>threw away months of development time for an off-brand collab nobody asked for
>barely any content to look forward to
>all PM got in return was "financial advice"
Nice game direction Limbabs

>>527610960
>On the other hand, new IDs HAS to match Maost in strength, otherwise they'll just feel underwhelming and redundant.
especially walpipi IDs
they always have to be top tier whenever they release.
last time time we got one that was "underwhelming". director went schizo and buffed phillipclair 3 seperate times