Anyone read this? Whole premise is that since there is no way to be sure how the universe started out of nothing, how the physical constants been this fine-tuned to be life permitting, and how life on our planet started (thus work of intelligent design), we should take the simplest solution: god. How is this not appealing to the god of the gaps fallacy? Can we be certain that there will never be a NEW new theory of everything? I mean sure it makes everything easy and helps us to find purpose in life, but isn't it indifferent in the end? I'm not against any theory of there being a creator, but has it to be personal one? This book made me a deist, not an agnostic like I used to be.