>>16727116
>you dont even need that much muscle
I agree. But that's not the "difficult" part of chopping wood. Which leads to my main point here.

>you math people are completly unable to grasp any level of nuance and meaning
No. It's you that doesn't understand the nuance here. You think that understanding what the symbols mean will render you capable of solving any complex math formula by plugging in numbers on a calculator.

Here, let's do some kindergarten calculus:
Pic related is the "integral" symbol. It basically means "area under a curve on a graph." For example, we can take the integral of y=x from 0 to 10 and find it is equal to 50. We can generalize this as a function (Indefinite integral or antiderivitive) as y=(x^2)/2. Plug in any x for that function and you'll get the integral of y=x from 0 to x. This makes sense as y=x draws half of a square with side lengths x.

Now, by plugging in numbers on a calculator and not simply googling the answer, find the Indefinite integral of y=x^2.
Show your work.