>>213157700
>why is the thrust of your argument the fact people can easily bypass it?
that wasn't the thrust of my argument
that was me replying to your accusation that it's the porn restrictions that bother me
>you also argue that its bad to try and protect kids
show me where i said this
i complained about the political censorship and the harmless sites being restricted (pic related), and also the joke of a claim that the government is doing it because they care about children