>>95893547
Of course that's not a real thing, we've been dealing with the same troll for nearly a week now and he can't even remember that cover rules is a common D&D-clone ruling. Do you really think he has any real knowledge of Paizo inner workings?

>Flurry changes
Honestly, just being Level 10 is enough of a nerf compared to 8. Fighter deserves the pain, but Flurry never actually been that notable a build pickup. Hell, it isn't like Fighter can't grab stuff like Twin Takedown or other 1 action double strikes, beyond the ones they ALREADY HAVE built in their fist list.

>>95893638
I know you just gonna go on your Spell Combat idea, so I won't go too far in here. I will note that it isn't really Magus's fault that Sure Strike is so notable on their kit. After all, they basically the best at using Spell Attacks barring fighter, so of course they like it. The problem is just how Sure Strike is designed, Advantage is just an incredible thing to give out for cheap. It's why it ISN'T the default Hero Point rule, it is on average a +4 to all your rolls and that's just absurd to give out by the hour. It's why I think >>95893649 isn't quite right, it's still too good to ignore entirely for caster buffs.
It really need to be like 5e's version or like Guidance where it is just a simple stat boost OR higher rank so it isn't so cheap to run on things like scrolls and wands. The way it is, even with the 10 minute cooldown, is still rather absurd. I used to brainstorm Warpriest running it in their Divine Fonts to make up for how FUBAR'd they used to be, that's how I know it is a big design issue.

>>95893674
>>95893695
You know Flurry is fine, right? It's good. It's a good option, it doesn't need to be changed! It does everything a Monk would want it to! Not everything needs to be god-tier, don't fix what isn't broken! Don't be Paizo!
Can agree that Godbreaker should be better. That's just...badly designed in every respect of the phrase.