>>16705938
Yeah, except for the uninstantiable empty-set causing an ontological paradox.

The uninstantiability of empty-sets (monadic objects) inside any symholic manifold produces a recursive chain of consequences (morphisms) which interact with one another (time) as a means of negating a collapse into a monadic mode of relation.

Think about it...

To define any object in reality you need:

1. Where the object is
2. Where it isnt (the manifold)
3. Where it is in relation to other objects inside the manifold

Consider the manifold itself an object is moronic.