>>713729793
You sound quite angry over the inability to message younglings in a borderline-dating VN of an RPG. Such a minor feature. Why is this what ails you the most about this videogame, anon?

>>713730947
Putting aside that most cretins making that argument on websites like this actually desire well below that age, the "oh no, a mere 2 years" argument can just as easily be used against people making a massive deal about it. Don't be afraid of actual non-zoomer women, anon.