Search Results
ID: QvK6MmXm/pol/512649115#512651007
8/10/2025, 1:17:23 AM
>>512649864
Liberals have always had a pro-Trump bias because of subtly worded anti-Trump articles. They would call him "unusual" a lot because it invites suspicion etc., say "unprecedented" even if it were an obvious lie, and whine of "changing norms" and alleged "judicial activism," which invites people to say things like "It's not unusual, it's evil!" and "It's rigging the courts!" There's also been explicit promotion of the idea that the media has always had a right-wing bias, and after each election Democrats lose, they do a humiliation ritual apologizing for right-wing biases. For example, the media spent its time in 2016 acting as a narrative mouthpiece for the Hillary campaign and as such its content toward both candidates was markedly different, with media trying to accuse Trump of being ebil toward immigrants all day while barely covering Hillary's unpopular policies and numerous scandals, instead focusing only on one scandal if they reported on it at all: Her emails scandal. Democrats have consistently just ignored the fact she had other ones, or blamed Russia, and claimed her policies would've been really popular if the media covered them more. Just imagine the media actually talking about how Hillary is going to push child sex changes and stuff on national TV. It would've been unpopular and caused a massive Trump landslide, but the Democrats run with this story.
>>512649722
>those “based Russians” would shoot you just as fast as they’d shoot me.
In what context? I'm pretty sure most armies have similar rules regarding who they shoot.
Liberals have always had a pro-Trump bias because of subtly worded anti-Trump articles. They would call him "unusual" a lot because it invites suspicion etc., say "unprecedented" even if it were an obvious lie, and whine of "changing norms" and alleged "judicial activism," which invites people to say things like "It's not unusual, it's evil!" and "It's rigging the courts!" There's also been explicit promotion of the idea that the media has always had a right-wing bias, and after each election Democrats lose, they do a humiliation ritual apologizing for right-wing biases. For example, the media spent its time in 2016 acting as a narrative mouthpiece for the Hillary campaign and as such its content toward both candidates was markedly different, with media trying to accuse Trump of being ebil toward immigrants all day while barely covering Hillary's unpopular policies and numerous scandals, instead focusing only on one scandal if they reported on it at all: Her emails scandal. Democrats have consistently just ignored the fact she had other ones, or blamed Russia, and claimed her policies would've been really popular if the media covered them more. Just imagine the media actually talking about how Hillary is going to push child sex changes and stuff on national TV. It would've been unpopular and caused a massive Trump landslide, but the Democrats run with this story.
>>512649722
>those “based Russians” would shoot you just as fast as they’d shoot me.
In what context? I'm pretty sure most armies have similar rules regarding who they shoot.
ID: y0f/MuVe/pol/512605755#512610220
8/9/2025, 2:32:28 PM
Page 1