>>4430032
> Shitty mirrorless just don't focus on the right spot like they can't see it.
funny you say that, happened with the D750 in this very review
https://admiringlight.com/blog/revisiting-the-dslr-is-mirrorless-really-better/
>there are a number of ways mirrorless has caught up and then surpassed what can be currently done in DSLRs
>they are not as quite as consistent, not as precise, and have lens to lens variability
>The number one letdown of the D750 over my R5, R8 and previous Sony bodies (and even my older Fujifilm and Micro 4/3 bodies), is focus precision
>An example is the shot above, which I simply could not get the camera to focus on the right spot using the standard PDAF focusing
>I would imagine most people still arguing for DSLR autofocus over mirrorless haven’t had a lot of experience in using more recent mirrorless cameras. This is because the precision of full sensor width Eye-AF and subject tracking is just a game changer compared to what a DSLR can do.
> At this positioning, the D750’s focus points wouldn’t be able to reach his eyes
> you can see just how small an area this AF system covers…and it’s one of the better DSLR systems for coverage! It amounts to just 15% of the area of the frame. Some higher end newer DSLRs do have a little more coverage than this, but even the dense D6 covers just 22% of the frame.

seems like mirrorless pretty good in comparison