Search Results
6/12/2025, 8:59:25 AM
>>17756810
Wikipedia is an extremely biased source and is not authoritative on matters of Christianity. The admins of wikipedia take atheists, people who oppose and deeply hate Christianity, as authoritative "reliable" sources for their claims. There is all kinds of false and unreliable information on there. There are much better resources out there you could choose from.
Furthermore, the co-founder of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger, even publicly criticized wikipedia specifically for its blatant anti-christian bias in its various articles, and it hasn't gotten better since then.
Wikipedia is an extremely biased source and is not authoritative on matters of Christianity. The admins of wikipedia take atheists, people who oppose and deeply hate Christianity, as authoritative "reliable" sources for their claims. There is all kinds of false and unreliable information on there. There are much better resources out there you could choose from.
Furthermore, the co-founder of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger, even publicly criticized wikipedia specifically for its blatant anti-christian bias in its various articles, and it hasn't gotten better since then.
Page 1