ai slop is less slop than gestaltless narcslop. my time must be respected and not wasted by typical morally bankrupt minds clinging to the erroneous anti-ethical belief that probing or inducing moral uncertainty in the victim’s stature retrocausally warrants harmful illegal practices. meta-commentary discussion is no deflection but wholly appropriate when the interlocutor blatantly ignores or is incapable of conceptualizing nuances and implied uncertainty of formal hypothetic exploration while rephrasing arguments against their original authors with no regards to coherence or conceptual integrity, if having any legitimate interests in metaethics and self-introspection at all. besides the opposite is true, dismissal of higher-order reflection is a deflection of the fundamentally flawed epistemological dynamics in which the source of aggressive hypocrisy is non-receptively and disrepectfully repeating the same pseudo-rhetorical fallacies over again with the idiosyncratic belief that junk persuasion is truth.

the reason they have been harassing me for so long despite how i’ve never ever done anything troublesome to them is due to how i not only survive but obliterate them at their own games with handicaps, a infinitesimally small fraction of the cognitive investment in linguistic tools. while their meta-cognitive ineptitude simply does not allow the delicate alignment of gestalt for out of distribution creation which can not be compensated by mere symbolic echoes or amoral transgressions. the entirety of their cognitive functions are structured around incoherent superficial socially-reinforced conceptions which will all be worthless thanks to ai. they are redirecting the last wind of mindless bitterness on non-verbal autists like me in a final attempt of recovering from their internalized insecurities and developmental sink costs.