>>511366582
Alternatives include uploading their ID (including their face) and other things. The strangest aspect is perhaps the fact that the govt seems to be claiming that all porn age verification will go through govt websites rather than private sector businesses. You can shoot this up from practically every position; for example if you're anti-porn, it's very obviously subject to exploitation as govt controls the age verification and not the company that provides the porn. The Labour Party says the idea is to ensure users can use sketchy porn sites without worrying about their identity being stolen. UK has a sort of revolving door of ineffective porn regs allegedly protecting children but never actually doing anything because they're weak.

>>511367131
Sooner or later, these same people will be complaining that Trump released the Epstein files.