>>50896428
checked
>The key factor here is that LBMA would only do this because they're out of metal/can't afford to fix prices anymore.
Agreed, and even more telling is where they referenced everyone to seek the new (fix).
Ex. (((Link in description)))
Looking to the (((market)))
I say again that it's all so tiresome because proximity is not the reality. Possession is. Being closer to the sources has it's advantages surely, but a bird in the hands is always worth 2 in the open markets, that's where counterparty risks are manufactured, and manipulated, obfuscated, rehypoticaed re-branded and solid again and again.
>when, not if the music stops having a seat is being in possession of one.