>>935684933
Until recently, admitting you were very sad was a surefire way to become ostracised and only recently has it become studied and the people have started coming forward, it is not unusual that it is a higher figure now.


Please tell me about how the machine works according to you.

>>935685218
>I’m curious—do you think there’s a way to study this more rigorously without it getting shut down or buried in conspiracy circles? Or is part of the issue that the effects are subtle and individualized by design?

The issue is, that there are contextual systems of human understanding that become key fulcrums for understanding one's predicament when such things happen, and none of them are accurate unless you start to incorporate all of the possible fulcrums into your study.

It is unethical to study these effects, so the public will not see the black project data.