>24463915
>Should I take my time, some time?
I do. Slow and steady. Check out the "tonk operator". I am advocating for a "ponk operator" where you are not in control of when the stick hits your head, that is when the implication is made.

>One must learn to see his eyes in order to fully understand the reality shaped around him by his senses

>Entropic Mismatch.
>Maybe we lived long-gone past our expiration date and thus arising the need for a return to an equilibrated state where death also happens for a while.

From a blog:
>I am not the only one to say such things! I am just another thinker in a long list of thinkers who are jumping up and down in excitement and pointing in the same (rather specific, to be blunt) direction. This has been going on for at least a century. Here are some:

>"The device by which an organism maintains itself stationary at a fairly high level of orderliness consists of continually sucking orderliness from the environment." – Erwin Schrodinger

>"A system will select the path or assembly of paths out of available paths that minimizes the potential or maximizes the entropy at the fastest rate given the constraints." – Rod Swenson

>"The path maximizing time derivative of exergy under the prevailing conditions will be selected." – Sven Jorgensen

>"For a finite– size system to persist in time (to live), it must evolve in such a way that it provides easier access to the imposed currents that flow through it." – Adrian Bejan

>"Intelligence is a force, F, that acts so as to maximize future freedom of action." – Alex Wissner– Gross

>"Dissipation– driven adaptation of matter" – Jeremy England

>"Free energy dissipation pathways competing for conduction resources" – Alex Nugent

>Note: If you are reading this and know of somebody else who has made similar statements, please leave a comment below!

Yeah of course, 2 minutes of google search later: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0895717794901880