>Epstein e-mails Staley and Erdoes and writes "RE financail deal. ideas.. 1. I think there will be many diverse and interesting opportunities to turn over almost turnkey transactions to JPM.. The Middle East, as it re-forms. will be a gold mine of new transacations, people, govt needs. I;m not sure of interest in places people , like syria, egypt, libya. , though there will be great needs and serious wealth and support. I am aware of the paramount need for sunshine. The new issues is these leaders are wary , of a strictly JPM approach as it represents to them a quasi- Us govt arm. a. There can be a relation with JPM and me. Jpm and a new or current investment boutique. ( Pritsker?, David Stern?, ( prince Andrew? , he is now allowed to make money)) or Joint venture with IAn Osbourne, ( Bloomberg would eventually join , if not otherwise occupied. -. There could be a fee /sharing. ( a bit boring but standard for hedge funds. ( the money gets 1/2 % - 1 out of the 2 fee„ and ussally 5 of the 20 carry. I am well aware of my current unfortunate rainbow . I am also aware that JPM has a colorful array of clients. so a client relationship is much less problematic than a instiutiioall joint venture. .. on the flip side the G20 issues, regulation, in europe. ( last time Great Britain )etc. was successfully handled. wiht no blow back , and i would argue great value to JPM. As mary kinldy pointed out, last time with Highbridge , the outcome was less than perfect. I would appreciate your/cutler thoughts. , and as both of you have not jumped with enthusiasm at the prospect of me sitting with him face to face, I leave it in your hands."

>Epstein e-mails Staley and Erdoes and writes "RE financail deal. ideas.. 1. I think there will be many diverse and interesting opportunities to turn over almost turnkey transactions to JPM.. The Middle East, as it re-forms. will be a gold mine of new transacations, people, govt needs. I;m not sure of interest in places people , like syria, egypt, libya. , though there will be great needs and serious wealth and support. I am aware of the paramount need for sunshine. The new issues is these leaders are wary , of a strictly JPM approach as it represents to them a quasi- Us govt arm. a. There can be a relation with JPM and me. Jpm and a new or current investment
boutique . ( Pritsker?, David Stern?, ( prince Andrew? , he is now allowed to make money)) or Joint venture with IAn Osbourne, ( Bloomberg would eventually join , if not otherwise occupied. -. There could be a fee /sharing. ( a bit boring but standard for hedge funds. ( the money gets 1/2 % - 1 out of the 2 fee„ and ussally 5 of the 20 carry. I am well aware of my current unfortunate rainbow . I am also aware that JPM has a colorful array of clients. so a client relationship is much less problematic than a instiutiioall joint venture. .. on the flip side the G20 issues, regulation, in europe. ( last time Great Britain )etc. was successfully handled. wiht no blow back , and i would argue great value to JPM. As mary kinldy pointed out, last time with Highbridge , the outcome was less than perfect. I would appreciate your/cutler thoughts. , and as both of you have not jumped with enthusiasm at the prospect of me sitting with him face to face, I leave it in your hands."