>>40831167
>Haha no. I think my understanding is true. Not "Truth".
If that was the case, you wouldn't have trouble processing ideas like, "There is more to the Truth than your understanding".

>So you said he's right but uh..? But he's right for the wrong reasons..?
No.
I've explained it twice. If you're literally still not getting it, then you're just putting on a clown show trying to make that my fault. Learn to read.

>>40831572
>You're admitting here that your worldview is fundamentally jewish
Yeah, no. That's stupid.

However, serious question: Are you the one who cares if a thing is "fundamentally jewish" or are you just saying this cuz you think I'd care?