I really need to learn how to make a point without writing a book.

I know why I do it; the idea is that I can fully flush out a point and avoid a dozen smaller exchanges by covering everything at once.

I am doing it right now. The burden of communication is on the one trying to be understood. But the person fails if the people they are addressing go blind on a tiresome, necessarily maundering wall of words when the forum setting is for banter exchange, not academic lecture.

I am self aware of the liability but seem unable to shake that anxiety of leaving out context and being misunderstood, leading to endless exchanges that I already considered.

Im quite mad, you know.

>>40280283
Some will claim that at least some portion of trans are heterosexuals. So then let us consider a question: If a man deliberately repels the attraction of most females, and finds a female mate even more rarely, and decidedly aligns not with straights, but with lgbt, then of what relevance or use is the claim?

And if the claim makes no sense, and is advanced by neither straights nor women, then what is its most likely source, if not men who are trying to decieve you with their appearance and arguments in the first place?

None of this is meant to imply that trans are innately immoral. Deception is a secondary trait of many mental challenges, rather than primary like that of sociopaths. Indeed, first they have to decieve themselves with the validity of such a life plan, and a mind has to already be injured by immense stress and emotional disruption like despair and fear to consider such a fantasy to be plausible.

Moreover, this vulnerability logically and naturally is most likely to occur in development, in youth when the mind is the least equipped to handle such stress at the time it is most likely to occur from social, identity and self image issues. In addition, there is a visible industry comprised of an unholy alliance between medicine, media, quackery professions and deliberate social saboteurs targeting these children who bombard them with messaging daily for their own profit and self aggrandization...

Honestly I have never understood the gay interest in penis. To me it just represents the absence of a vagina, or by association, a woman, and therefore another male. It only exists as part of the bigger picture: a male like any other that, for whatever reason, finds itself in need of another enough to depart all the social or ego considerations of being a male. It can be because of any individual rebellion. That motive is proof of the contradiction in nature and humans. It emerges in the individual precisely because all the narratives we live by exist because these rules meet challenges in reality. In reality, in the world of social transaction and choices, males often need other males so deeply that they are driven to break not one, but many, many rules to gain advantage, even survival. Serving as a physical outlet is just one of them. It just happens to be the most blatantly undeniable, presumably thus the one that causes the most eternal consternation among our institutions. The more males who are compelled to turn to sexual submission to resolve a personal conflict, the more its evidence that the institution is failing its people. Its not some coincidence.

Again, its not just same sex. Guys have to break all sorts of rules to get by in a rough world, emotionally or practically. There are many endeavors that follow or reflect this contradiction. War, oppression, slavery or brutality. You are not as likely to find males in such need of others that they have to make these negotiations if their social leadership is working and everything is running well for every individual. The whole point is that it is an exception, not the norm. A society of strong males does not normally go about selling their presumed dignity for comfort or protection. If it becomes rampant, its because something is causing it, and the ones denouncing it are usually the same ones causing the imbalance.