>>40738377
>It is so intellectually dishonest to call them Christians.
>No real Christian can be with a succubus you goof ball
What the fuck? Weren't you talking about being intelligent before?

What credible, non-sectarian definition of "Christian" do you think could POSSIBLY exist other than "worshipper of Jesus as a savior-figure"?
And news flash: That definition doesn't even rule out cherry-picking or varying interpretations.

The kind of gatekeeping you're trying to do right now is a holdover from before Christianity's decline.
Obviously its not going to fly now.