Search Results
7/22/2025, 11:58:40 AM
>>105985984
>an image generator has nothing to communicate or express.
Yet the image does indeed communicate and express, with or without the intent of the author. The message is head, even if the message is not said. Even if "no one" said the message, you're still there to hear it.
>AI slop enjoyers have the visual processing system of insects and they can't tell if something is fundamentally worse even on the level of basic technique, nevermind discussions about the meaning of art.
By that standard, at least we can agree that "modern art" is not art, by any definition.
Art lost its way when it stopped considering beauty as objective. A platonic ideal if you will. That's the reason AI art "works", and modern or post-modern art doesn't. Because beauty is objective, and it can be captured. Monkey brain can tell apart beautiful from ugly. Simple as. It takes a very special academic torture and a very sick mind to "educate yourself" out of appreciating beauty.
>an image generator has nothing to communicate or express.
Yet the image does indeed communicate and express, with or without the intent of the author. The message is head, even if the message is not said. Even if "no one" said the message, you're still there to hear it.
>AI slop enjoyers have the visual processing system of insects and they can't tell if something is fundamentally worse even on the level of basic technique, nevermind discussions about the meaning of art.
By that standard, at least we can agree that "modern art" is not art, by any definition.
Art lost its way when it stopped considering beauty as objective. A platonic ideal if you will. That's the reason AI art "works", and modern or post-modern art doesn't. Because beauty is objective, and it can be captured. Monkey brain can tell apart beautiful from ugly. Simple as. It takes a very special academic torture and a very sick mind to "educate yourself" out of appreciating beauty.
Page 1