Going through a DOJ review of the first Epstein case
The shit the DOJ writes in these self reviews is fucking wild sometimes.
>OPR found no clear and unambiguous standard that required Acosta to indict Epstein on federal charges or that prohibited his decision to defer prosecution to the state.

OPR (aka the DOJ), found no clear standard that a US Attorney in charge of the Epstein case (Acosta), was required to indict Epstein.
Think about that for a second.
The review has all the evidence of child prostitution and child sex that Epstein ended up pleading guilty to.
Yet the review says, in the face of the evidence of Epstein having child sex and pimping children, the US Attorney was under no obligation to indict Epstein

Man, I've read these DOJ self-reviews before, and they are all like that.
>Yeah, Strzok did all kinds of bad shit, but there is no rules saying he can't do bad shit
They always say that,
>There's nothing in the handbook that says you can't be evil
Every fucking report.
Tells you how evil and fucked up the DOJ guys are
And always concludes
>We have no rules against being evil and fucked up, so this is not in violation of the DOJ

https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl