Search Results
7/25/2025, 6:21:14 AM
>>213066920
nta fag, but both shows are funny in their own way. Not everything is a contest.
nta fag, but both shows are funny in their own way. Not everything is a contest.
6/19/2025, 6:17:20 AM
>>24478177
You dumb jew, "in all theoretical sciences of reason synthetic a priori judgments are contained as principles", Kant states he's treating with one theoretical science, the object of which is determined by the basic definitions of arithmetic and logic. This is no presupposition, but a simple exposition of a synthetic a priori judgment on an object defined by what you call "presuppositions". Not only that, this exposition does show how, even if one could -at first- think the statement is not synthetic, the concept of the sum: "contains nothing beyond the union of the two numbers into one, whereby nothing is being thought as to what this single number may be which combines both", and thus needing of something necessarily adhered to itself, intuition. Without the means of intuition we can't arrive at anything but an union that is resolved by means of our access to intuition expressed in various forms (in this case Kant refers to our fingers or points on a page I'd assume): the making of a synthetic a priori judgment. This reaching beyond itself, characteristic of a synthetic judgment, is a necessary part of the a priori judgments that form the topic Kant called pure mathematics in virtue of the lack of resolve found on the concept sum -without intuition-: "We are told that we ought to add in thought a certain predicate to a given concept, and this necessity adheres to the very concepts. But the question is not what we ought to add to the "five" concept, but what we actually think in it, even if only confusedly; and then it becomes clear that the predicate does indeed necessarily adhere to those concepts, not, however, as something thought in the concept itself, but by means of an intuition that must be added to the concept". In the same way you can't extract anything beyond the union of 7 and 5, you can't extract anything beyond the union of 1+1+1+1+1+1+1, unless you arrive there by help of intuition.
I'll go over the other points later, as I said before, we have time nigger.
WHOAZERS! HE POSTED AGAIN WITHOUT A DRAWN GIRL ANIME IMAGE! THE MEANING! IT HAS CHANGED! ZOMG! OOOOOHHHHHHHHH HE CAN NOW POST HERE!!!!
You dumb jew, "in all theoretical sciences of reason synthetic a priori judgments are contained as principles", Kant states he's treating with one theoretical science, the object of which is determined by the basic definitions of arithmetic and logic. This is no presupposition, but a simple exposition of a synthetic a priori judgment on an object defined by what you call "presuppositions". Not only that, this exposition does show how, even if one could -at first- think the statement is not synthetic, the concept of the sum: "contains nothing beyond the union of the two numbers into one, whereby nothing is being thought as to what this single number may be which combines both", and thus needing of something necessarily adhered to itself, intuition. Without the means of intuition we can't arrive at anything but an union that is resolved by means of our access to intuition expressed in various forms (in this case Kant refers to our fingers or points on a page I'd assume): the making of a synthetic a priori judgment. This reaching beyond itself, characteristic of a synthetic judgment, is a necessary part of the a priori judgments that form the topic Kant called pure mathematics in virtue of the lack of resolve found on the concept sum -without intuition-: "We are told that we ought to add in thought a certain predicate to a given concept, and this necessity adheres to the very concepts. But the question is not what we ought to add to the "five" concept, but what we actually think in it, even if only confusedly; and then it becomes clear that the predicate does indeed necessarily adhere to those concepts, not, however, as something thought in the concept itself, but by means of an intuition that must be added to the concept". In the same way you can't extract anything beyond the union of 7 and 5, you can't extract anything beyond the union of 1+1+1+1+1+1+1, unless you arrive there by help of intuition.
I'll go over the other points later, as I said before, we have time nigger.
WHOAZERS! HE POSTED AGAIN WITHOUT A DRAWN GIRL ANIME IMAGE! THE MEANING! IT HAS CHANGED! ZOMG! OOOOOHHHHHHHHH HE CAN NOW POST HERE!!!!
Page 1