Search Results
2/17/2025, 9:28:58 PM
This is not directly related to the other discussion but it reminded me of something that annoyed me in the last beta.
>few or no tanks for the other specs, eleventeen trillion redundant tanks for Armored and Marines!
Seriously. When I was making US Armored and Marine decks, I remember being baffled by the fact that there were like, 6 or 7 different Abrams in my deck list that had only minor differences between them.
>this Abrams has 1 more health and 100 more armor
>this Abrams has a slightly different ammunition loadout, therefore it's a separate vehicle entirely
Why? The Russian decks had a similar thing going on I think. Can't we just make a lot of these very small differences into optional loadout upgrades to cut down on the clutter? We have this great feature that the devs implemented to have one vehicle but with a variety of different loadouts that can change how it plays. We don't need to be like Eugen and have 7 different PoopenSchitten-Modelo Type 72B52s all in the same deck filling basically the same role.
>few or no tanks for the other specs, eleventeen trillion redundant tanks for Armored and Marines!
Seriously. When I was making US Armored and Marine decks, I remember being baffled by the fact that there were like, 6 or 7 different Abrams in my deck list that had only minor differences between them.
>this Abrams has 1 more health and 100 more armor
>this Abrams has a slightly different ammunition loadout, therefore it's a separate vehicle entirely
Why? The Russian decks had a similar thing going on I think. Can't we just make a lot of these very small differences into optional loadout upgrades to cut down on the clutter? We have this great feature that the devs implemented to have one vehicle but with a variety of different loadouts that can change how it plays. We don't need to be like Eugen and have 7 different PoopenSchitten-Modelo Type 72B52s all in the same deck filling basically the same role.
Page 1