>>23061978
i do in fact wonder how do you leak a niche mostly inactive technically public but gatekept by the premise thread that was originally conceived as a joke on a half-dead board that gets visited by like 5 people on a good day, shouldn't be possible should it
>>23061995
it's not your fault the thread you created for us to be big brains in got sabotaged and taken away by such an unfortunate and unforeseen event but actually i guess you are partially to blame for making such an awesome hard-going op image that attracted some random newgen almost immediately so to make up for that you should actually be the one who makes the next edition which should be extremely obscure and only understood by the oldest of the oldheads