>>280016398
>Hmmm, what if I watch episode 4 in December, and ep 5 in 2026?
Wait.. Weren't you going to do in any case?
>He was being facetious...
How do we know it wasn't a nervous laugh?
>So, he became Oozauru and then reverted to regular Vegeta?
Bulma gave an explanation about the effects of Baby interfering with Vegeta's body.
>He never said anything about GT...
He definitely said those words.
>She did far worse than that...
Proof?
>Like the artificial humans?
The Tsufurian version? Yes.
>I'm sure if it was handled by someone very powerful, it would.
Isn't that like using a paper to destroy an entire city?
>Because, the other two, are also victims of Pan's temper.
Proof? Pan would never take her anger and frustrations out on others..
>Did Pan take into account that her grandfather could just teleport behind Zunama and dismember him in a fraction of a second?
His teleportation wasn't in a usable state..
>What about the Tsuffurian happiness, Pan never showed any sympathy for the tsuffurian holocaust.
Eh? What about that time she tried to reason with Baby? Besides, she is not responsible or should feel guilty about the things other people did..
>The face Goku made when he said that...
Goku's facial expression conveyed confidence in his words
>Not necessarily, he was a perfect organism, it's only natural for him to be efficient...
Do they have souls?
>Now?
Next post.
>They must have, how else could they differentiate him?
I don't remember anyone mentioning that name..

>>280016429

>...
It's true.
>Pan damaged their property, and cause made them lose a lot of money,
Can they not claim on the insurance? I mean, it's not like they won't get whatever they lost back in interest...
>I believe that Pan should be forced to serve Trunks.
Pan cannot do that. Why? Because that goes against her freedoms.
>I'm sure they could find evidence that incriminates Pan...
Explain how?

Continued..