Search Results
6/17/2025, 10:27:28 PM
>>935905648
Yeah. It's better described as a detector for how fuckable a specific image is, especially for an hmofaggot. Or more specifically how many "conventionally attractive" features it finds, in its own descriptive words, counter to any negative features in the image.
It has zero nuance as to how good of a lay a particular character in an image may be, beyond those visible features, often opting for a pass/fail result than an inbetween.
Yeah. It's better described as a detector for how fuckable a specific image is, especially for an hmofaggot. Or more specifically how many "conventionally attractive" features it finds, in its own descriptive words, counter to any negative features in the image.
It has zero nuance as to how good of a lay a particular character in an image may be, beyond those visible features, often opting for a pass/fail result than an inbetween.
Page 1