>>508525008
>Jesus is a Jewish version of the Imperial Cult and a proto-Marxist attack on it (call no man father, the emperor was father to the empire, fathers held absolute power over their family).
If you're going to call yeshua a marxist then point to the actual undeniable marxism, the sermon on the mount. This is the parasitic approach to a societal takeover and this is why the communist revolution succeeded in Russia - you throw the catnip that enthralls the poor people who are always the majority of the demographic by the nature of resource distribution itself, you pilpul the reason for their poverty and you radicalize them against the central government by blaming it all on it.

This is why whenever you're faced with a jewish revolution the critique of resource distribution is always central to it. You have the French revolution that pulled the jews out of the ghettos and it was central there, you have the communist revolution, and you also have the christcuck revolution that exclusively targeted poor people in the first phase. What did all three of these do in parallel to the vilification of your country's resource distribution? They also vilified your country's culture and traditions so that you couldn't flee back to them if you felt betrayed by having been born poor. It's easy to brush off the poverty by saying, "there will always be someone wealthier than me, but I'd rather have him be in our empire than one of the rivals". Remove the national or imperial umbilical cord from the minds of poor people, make them stop identifying the empire or nation as "our", and they can no longer justify their poverty anymore. Something needs to be done to make whoever made them poor pay for it. There is no nationalist or imperial fallback and your ancestors have all been vilified and implied to have had fallen for it, deliberately or by accident. You're betrayed by everyone and your only comrade is the revolution.