>>937128613
You're wrong again. Egyptian worship of Hathor at Nabta Playa dates back to 6000 BCE, long before Zoroastrianism (1600 BCE at earliest). Yahwism, a polytheistic precursor to Judaism, had Yahweh with a consort and divine family which is hardly the ‘Abrahamic’ root you’re claiming. The Torah, finalized around 600 BCE during the Babylonian exile, is a latecomer compared to Mesopotamian legal codes like Hammurabi’s. So, no, laws didn’t flow from some universal ‘God’s teachings’. Humans crafted gods and laws to make sense of the world, from natural disasters to morality.
Your claim that all societies reflect divine notions ignores, yet again, secular systems like Roman law or modern constitutions. Genghis Khan even invented Tengrism to enforce his own moral code which is more proof for that humans shape gods, not the other way around.
Your framework’s stuck in an outdated narrative, blind to what we now know about history. That's why you keep throwing around these argumentum ad nausea. Step up and cite the specific ‘God’s laws’ still ruling modern legal systems, or admit you’re reaching.
>>937128613
>I think we both know your understanding of these topics is guided by emotions and mostly by fear
The same unsubstantiated claims again. That's what I meant with your framework being outdated. You're unable to adapt to new information and continuously resort to regurgitating the same tired nonsense over and over again.
It's clear to all that you've lost, hermana