>>532266847
>ad hominem
you people are always like this, claiming to be leaders of rationality (it's fine when people are of all colors of rainbow because creative freedom!) but then resorting to lowly emotionally driven "arguments" (you're a bigot and a bad person for not liking it!) when their points fail. i am not going to engage with you because you've provided no solid foundation on why that particular fictional world is it is the way it is. artistic vision? lore-justified cataclysm? geographical location?
either way, have a gecko gods webm