Search Results
6/28/2025, 12:39:56 PM
>>713881526
>deal with it
I do, by not paying and calling out people like you that keep defending shitty practices like that.
>large library of ps games.
I do too,so that's fair.
The ps+ is NOT about being poor, but is about principle. Having the ability to use your own connection to play with others is a dogshit and scummy concept.
Why do I have to pay to play with others? Only because I have to pass thru sony's servers even for games that does not nees to? Even is the only thing the game has isn't even playing with others but some feature the game has.
It bullshit. It's not about being poor. The price isn't the issue, but it's the idea and the practice of it. And while they are not the first one to do it (sega back with the Genesis I belive, and later Microsoft with the 360), doesn't mean it's a good practice that should be defended. All they want to do is squeeze from you more money, and the free games are basically a subscrition service,which is utter cancer in my opinion but that's me.
>deal with it
I do, by not paying and calling out people like you that keep defending shitty practices like that.
>large library of ps games.
I do too,so that's fair.
The ps+ is NOT about being poor, but is about principle. Having the ability to use your own connection to play with others is a dogshit and scummy concept.
Why do I have to pay to play with others? Only because I have to pass thru sony's servers even for games that does not nees to? Even is the only thing the game has isn't even playing with others but some feature the game has.
It bullshit. It's not about being poor. The price isn't the issue, but it's the idea and the practice of it. And while they are not the first one to do it (sega back with the Genesis I belive, and later Microsoft with the 360), doesn't mean it's a good practice that should be defended. All they want to do is squeeze from you more money, and the free games are basically a subscrition service,which is utter cancer in my opinion but that's me.
Page 1