Search Results
ID: R+4fNHLT/pol/508713026#508726655
6/25/2025, 11:23:51 PM
>>508723039
"air-defense" is a myth anyway since the start of arial warfare. it should be renamed into "arial damage control efforts".
one thing is for sure: i dont want to live anywhere near an AD system, anywhere near its guarding objectives or anywhere near the major attack routes.
i would fear the AD-systems more than the missiles they try to intercept.
>AD is not for the public - only for the "valuable assets" - the public can deal with misfires, debris or damaged missiles hitting residential buildings kilometres from the "valuable asset".
"air-defense" is a myth anyway since the start of arial warfare. it should be renamed into "arial damage control efforts".
one thing is for sure: i dont want to live anywhere near an AD system, anywhere near its guarding objectives or anywhere near the major attack routes.
i would fear the AD-systems more than the missiles they try to intercept.
>AD is not for the public - only for the "valuable assets" - the public can deal with misfires, debris or damaged missiles hitting residential buildings kilometres from the "valuable asset".
Page 1