case study report: experimental communication with wild, lesser intelligent beings

me: suffering must be reduced to a minimum
being: how?
me: may provide a safety option for those who need it urgently for example
being: no that would reduce suffering but you said you would to reduce suffering! this is not the same thing because i say so and this is the appealtonotruedichotomy fallacy
me: owo b-but [ explain the semantic, logical, conceptual, ethical, and contextual consistency of my messages ]
being: [ dull highly-redundant verbose nonsense written in hypercommon neurotypical slop style ] [ ugly gooner image.jpg ]
me: [ question the point of reading hand-written slop ]
being: [ arbitrary-order recursive projection ] [ repeat the same arguments again despite proven wrong with the insane belief that repetition is truth ]
me: [ have patience and kindness to explain ]
being: btw i wasted your time therefor you bad
me: [ regret sharing art cause i forgor how much pigs love throwing mud ] [ they have been projecting their false dichotomy and all meme arguments on me this whole time, as per usual, thus describe their misconceptions in a more appropriate stupidity-accommodating way ]
being: [ realize their arguments are worthless ] [ push longer highly-repetitive inadequately-assertive verbose nonsense ] [ ugly gooner image.jpg ]
me: uwu o-ok

while i am objectively less wrong, the insecure and cognitively limited beings may fail to acknowledge superior intelligence due to untranslatable abstract language and discrepant completeness of world model. the belligerents appear to maintain a disproportional pretense of accuracy with perpetual projection of infinite misunderstandings where over-emphasis on junk persuasion, i.e. low quality low density rumination, is a function of socio-primitive tribal values. thus it is clear to us, detached and rational agents, that it is preferable to ignore such beings as their epistemological contribution is null outside observational data.