Search Results
ID: 1zL0ElNv/pol/509829749#509832803
7/8/2025, 4:25:24 PM
>>509832710
>I’m seeing posts attacking the President’s decision
Critics might argue this diverts resources from domestic needs, but the math doesn’t lie—aid to Ukraine is a drop in the federal budget, and the return on investment is massive. It’s hard to imagine a policy more aligned with putting America’s security, economy, and global dominance first than arming Ukraine to bleed out Russia’s ambitions.
**Also spare me the MIC arguments (yes, I've read War is a Racket, and more than once) and the war-mongering labeling. I want peace. Peace is NOT surrender.
3. Reinforcing Global Leadership: An America First approach doesn’t mean isolationism; it means leading on terms that benefit the U.S. Arming Ukraine showcases American power and reliability, reassuring allies like Poland and the Baltics, who host U.S. troops and buy American weapons. It also counters China’s influence, as Beijing watches how the U.S. supports its partners. A Ukrainian victory strengthens America’s diplomatic clout, ensuring favorable trade and security deals.
4. Moral and Strategic Credibility: Supporting Ukraine showcases America as a defender of sovereignty and territorial integrity, principles tied to the America First movement. Ukraine’s fight against Russia’s unprovoked invasion aligns with American values of self-determination and resistance to tyranny. By providing weapons, the U.S. backs a nation defending its people and borders, reinforcing America’s image as a leader on this issues. This also resonates with Americans who see their country as a force for good, fostering national pride and unity. America. Is. Exceptional. This is a core tenet of MAGA. It also counters narratives from adversaries like Russia and China, who paint the U.S. as hypocritical or declining. Failing to support Ukraine would erode this credibility, signaling weakness to allies and emboldening authoritarians, which could destabilize regions critical to U.S. interests.
>part 2
>I’m seeing posts attacking the President’s decision
Critics might argue this diverts resources from domestic needs, but the math doesn’t lie—aid to Ukraine is a drop in the federal budget, and the return on investment is massive. It’s hard to imagine a policy more aligned with putting America’s security, economy, and global dominance first than arming Ukraine to bleed out Russia’s ambitions.
**Also spare me the MIC arguments (yes, I've read War is a Racket, and more than once) and the war-mongering labeling. I want peace. Peace is NOT surrender.
3. Reinforcing Global Leadership: An America First approach doesn’t mean isolationism; it means leading on terms that benefit the U.S. Arming Ukraine showcases American power and reliability, reassuring allies like Poland and the Baltics, who host U.S. troops and buy American weapons. It also counters China’s influence, as Beijing watches how the U.S. supports its partners. A Ukrainian victory strengthens America’s diplomatic clout, ensuring favorable trade and security deals.
4. Moral and Strategic Credibility: Supporting Ukraine showcases America as a defender of sovereignty and territorial integrity, principles tied to the America First movement. Ukraine’s fight against Russia’s unprovoked invasion aligns with American values of self-determination and resistance to tyranny. By providing weapons, the U.S. backs a nation defending its people and borders, reinforcing America’s image as a leader on this issues. This also resonates with Americans who see their country as a force for good, fostering national pride and unity. America. Is. Exceptional. This is a core tenet of MAGA. It also counters narratives from adversaries like Russia and China, who paint the U.S. as hypocritical or declining. Failing to support Ukraine would erode this credibility, signaling weakness to allies and emboldening authoritarians, which could destabilize regions critical to U.S. interests.
>part 2
Page 1