>>512293841
>Belgium is just a retarded joining.
joining of what?
>Burgundy
>Not Belgium
Yes it is
>So... do you mean the Catholic parts of THE NETHERLANDS?
So what? The netherlands is just a name. The netherlands could be called the protestant part of Belgium (which was the latin name for the Netherlands).
No reason why one part is fake and the other not.
>Still Walonia shouldn't be included
And Why? Wallonia (which is a modern creation like the flemish region) was always part of those entities. Just look at a map.
Only the Liège bishopric had a more loose relationship with the southern netherlands, because it was more associated with...Germany
>But yeah, it kind of makes sense as Walonia was the French region of the Germanic Holly Empire.
No one will ever say that Wallonia (fake entity) had ever anything to do with France. It was just a romance-speaking part of the Netherlands.