Search Results
7/22/2025, 6:14:01 AM
>>511022856
Making is one thing but reliability is another, 15 years ago we had Chinese engines for Su-30 due to Russian delay and the Chinese have half the lifespan since they were still working on the alloying process.
Despite that assuming the Chinese didn't learn after churning out so much product is just arrogance when Harbin delivers every size of turbines far faster than the west could ever dream of.
For naval turbines it was Ukraine that sold off Soviet tech to China in the 90's that saved them decades of work.
This kind of arrogance reminds me of Bongs in WW2 who went
>Jap monkeys can't possibly weld ships because their first ship in the 30's broke in half muh superior battleship will wreck them
>Japs can't possibly land tanks with the Royal Navy around
Then Force Z jobbed like a bitch and 5 years building Malaya defence line got steamrolled in a month because the defence line wasn't provided anti tank weapons only anti tank rifle from WW1.
Making is one thing but reliability is another, 15 years ago we had Chinese engines for Su-30 due to Russian delay and the Chinese have half the lifespan since they were still working on the alloying process.
Despite that assuming the Chinese didn't learn after churning out so much product is just arrogance when Harbin delivers every size of turbines far faster than the west could ever dream of.
For naval turbines it was Ukraine that sold off Soviet tech to China in the 90's that saved them decades of work.
This kind of arrogance reminds me of Bongs in WW2 who went
>Jap monkeys can't possibly weld ships because their first ship in the 30's broke in half muh superior battleship will wreck them
>Japs can't possibly land tanks with the Royal Navy around
Then Force Z jobbed like a bitch and 5 years building Malaya defence line got steamrolled in a month because the defence line wasn't provided anti tank weapons only anti tank rifle from WW1.
Page 1