>>717792038
>since you clearly only think art is "things I like" when art can be ugly and give room for interpretation
that is not what i said at all
what the fuck are you even talking about
i said good art influences people to be better, that's why good art is necessary
so obviously the opposite is true. i even say so
>an ugly surrounding = an ugly mind

the function of art is that it influences. its why churches commissioned the sistine chapel, its why advertisement companies spend millions every year on commercials, its why special interest groups fund specific artsits and promote them