>>510838862
>validation and attention
More importantly, women have lived off men’s work since the dawn of time because they carried children. They still do independently of what they tell you or what they believe. I’m my country women live 7 years more than men in average. We all pay the same percentage in taxes to support the pensioners… essentially men are subsidising women’s existence. Now… why should we keep doing this if we are all equal now? They have rejected their traditional roles, now imagine they stop carrying children too. What’s the point of women altogether? Why should we pay for them? And always remember, it was them the ones that started this shitstorm.

>>510407565
>should not be her problem
Not my problem. Honestly all I want right now is the welfare state to completely collapse so I’m not required to pay for them anymore and I can finally say “Not my problem” and mean it. That is all. IDGAF about any of these psyops. This pop psychologization of all the things is part of the (((feminization))) of society and I reject it fundamentally. It is fake and gay. Economics is all that matters in the end.