Search Results
6/25/2025, 8:42:40 PM
>>16707263
>obviously wrong information on his infographic
Which infographic? How is it wrong? The infographic in the OP pic is not his, it is the expected orbital velocities of stars in distant galaxies vs the observed rate.
>>16707307
>>16707314
lmao ok then, make up stories in your head about how I'm like a flat-earther or a woman who believes in tarot card readings, then proceed to judge and poo poo those made up personas
>>16707316
>So, how exactly did you determine if anything he said is worth listening to?
I've watched and read a lot of stuff(mainly popsci) on dark matter. So I am attracted to any plausible explanation for dark matter. I think this guy is basically saying that length contraction and time dilatation weren't accounted for when measuring the orbital velocities of stars in galaxies. When you account for that, and plot it on a graph, it equals the missing matter(dark matter) curve shown in the OP pic. I thought that sounds plausible and worth listening to. Now I come to 4chan to see what others think.
If you think he's a retard then say "He is a retard because X" where X equals a flaw in his logic, math or reasoning. So far I've just gotten that he's a retard because "you can tell", "he isn't published in a journal", "he is on youtube", "he sells books", "obviously wrong", *random tangents about flat earth and tarot card reading*.
>obviously wrong information on his infographic
Which infographic? How is it wrong? The infographic in the OP pic is not his, it is the expected orbital velocities of stars in distant galaxies vs the observed rate.
>>16707307
>>16707314
lmao ok then, make up stories in your head about how I'm like a flat-earther or a woman who believes in tarot card readings, then proceed to judge and poo poo those made up personas
>>16707316
>So, how exactly did you determine if anything he said is worth listening to?
I've watched and read a lot of stuff(mainly popsci) on dark matter. So I am attracted to any plausible explanation for dark matter. I think this guy is basically saying that length contraction and time dilatation weren't accounted for when measuring the orbital velocities of stars in galaxies. When you account for that, and plot it on a graph, it equals the missing matter(dark matter) curve shown in the OP pic. I thought that sounds plausible and worth listening to. Now I come to 4chan to see what others think.
If you think he's a retard then say "He is a retard because X" where X equals a flaw in his logic, math or reasoning. So far I've just gotten that he's a retard because "you can tell", "he isn't published in a journal", "he is on youtube", "he sells books", "obviously wrong", *random tangents about flat earth and tarot card reading*.
Page 1